knobit.org

C1 (3 points)

edu:Question

https://knobit.org/id/task/dsec-log-integrity-recertification/C1

Also as Turtle · JSON-LD · RDF/XML

dcterms:licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
owl:sameAshttps://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/dsec-log-integrity-recertification/C1
rdfs:labelC1 (3 points) en
schema:hasPartdsec-log-integrity-recertification C1: the restricted-read log with no reviewer and no review on record
schema:hasPartdsec-log-integrity-recertification C1: a log with a reviewer but no frequency, reviewed once ad hoc
schema:hasPartdsec-log-integrity-recertification C1: unreviewed logs given a named reviewer and a stated frequency
schema:identifierC1
schema:position1
schema:textLogs nobody reviews, 1 each. (a) LS-102, the log of reads of customer.personal_code, has no reviewer and no review frequency, and the review record shows no review in six months. (b) LS-104, the export gateway log, names the DPO but no review frequency, and was reviewed once in six months (ad hoc, after a complaint): it is not reviewed either. (c) Both are given a named reviewer and a stated frequency (e.g. SOC daily or weekly, escalating to the DPO); a reviewer without a frequency, or 'on request', earns nothing. en

Used by

has questionCustomer data warehouse log review and recertification schedule (monitoring and audit coverage skills)
schema:isPartOfdsec-log-integrity-recertification C1: the restricted-read log with no reviewer and no review on record
schema:isPartOfdsec-log-integrity-recertification C1: a log with a reviewer but no frequency, reviewed once ad hoc
schema:isPartOfdsec-log-integrity-recertification C1: unreviewed logs given a named reviewer and a stated frequency