@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix edu: <https://knobit.org/def/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix schema: <https://schema.org/> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://knobit.org/id/task/dsec-log-integrity-recertification/C1> a edu:Question ;
    rdfs:label "C1 (3 points)"@en ;
    dcterms:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/> ;
    owl:sameAs <https://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/dsec-log-integrity-recertification/C1> ;
    schema:hasPart <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-security#SE-550>,
        <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-security#SE-551>,
        <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-security#SE-552> ;
    schema:identifier "C1" ;
    schema:position 1 ;
    schema:text "Logs nobody reviews, 1 each. (a) LS-102, the log of reads of customer.personal_code, has no reviewer and no review frequency, and the review record shows no review in six months. (b) LS-104, the export gateway log, names the DPO but no review frequency, and was reviewed once in six months (ad hoc, after a complaint): it is not reviewed either. (c) Both are given a named reviewer and a stated frequency (e.g. SOC daily or weekly, escalating to the DPO); a reviewer without a frequency, or 'on request', earns nothing."@en .

edu:Question rdfs:label "Question"@en,
        "Küsimus"@et .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-security#SE-550> rdfs:label "dsec-log-integrity-recertification C1: the restricted-read log with no reviewer and no review on record"@en .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-security#SE-551> rdfs:label "dsec-log-integrity-recertification C1: a log with a reviewer but no frequency, reviewed once ad hoc"@en .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-security#SE-552> rdfs:label "dsec-log-integrity-recertification C1: unreviewed logs given a named reviewer and a stated frequency"@en .