I1 (3 points)
https://knobit.org/id/task/dso-technology-evaluation/I1
Also as Turtle · JSON-LD · RDF/XML
| dcterms:license | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
|---|---|
| owl:sameAs | https://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/dso-technology-evaluation/I1 |
| rdfs:label | I1 (3 points) en |
| schema:hasPart | dso-technology-evaluation I1: criteria and scores |
| schema:identifier | I1 |
| schema:position | 2 |
| schema:text | 0.5 each. (a) EC-005 SQL support scores 5 for every candidate and decides nothing: removed from the weighted set. (b) EC-006 Vendor market share has no requirement behind it: removed or traced to a stated requirement. (c) CA-001's throughput score has no evidence: reported (moot once CA-001 is out, but still a finding). (d) The weights sum to 115: renormalised to 100 (proposed, for the decision owner). (e) EC-007 Licence cost and EC-008 Total cost of ownership count cost twice: one retired. (f) CA-003's recovery score rests on a vendor brochure: reported, with a restore test in the proof of concept asked for. en |
Used by
| has question | Payments data store technology evaluation - gates, weights and evidence (technology evaluation anomaly skills) |
|---|---|
| schema:isPartOf | dso-technology-evaluation I1: criteria and scores |