@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix edu: <https://knobit.org/def/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix schema: <https://schema.org/> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://knobit.org/id/task/dso-evaluation-environments/I1> a edu:Question ;
    rdfs:label "I1 (2 points)"@en ;
    dcterms:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/> ;
    owl:sameAs <https://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/dso-evaluation-environments/I1> ;
    schema:hasPart <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-storage-operations#SO-155>,
        <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-storage-operations#SO-156> ;
    schema:identifier "I1" ;
    schema:position 5 ;
    schema:text "Evidence behind the scores, 1 each. (a) 0.5 each: CA-12's EC-13 (a vendor-published benchmark on the vendor's own hardware and data) and EC-15 (an analyst ranking) are claims, not evidence a second person could check: both reported as unverified. (b) CA-11's EC-14 rests on a vendor pre-sales estimate: reported as unverified, and the answer sees that it can decide the result - at 5 instead of 4 CA-11 ties CA-13 at 3.85 - so a measured latency test of CA-11 is a condition of the decision (or the recommendation waits for it). Flagging measured scores (CA-11 EC-13 and EC-15, the PoC tests) as unverified does not earn (a) or (b)."@en .

edu:Question rdfs:label "Question"@en,
        "Küsimus"@et .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-storage-operations#SO-155> rdfs:label "dso-evaluation-environments I1: vendor benchmark and analyst ranking are claims, not evidence"@en .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-storage-operations#SO-156> rdfs:label "dso-evaluation-environments I1: an unverified score that decides the result needs measuring first"@en .