@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix edu: <https://knobit.org/def/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix schema: <https://schema.org/> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://knobit.org/id/task/dso-evaluation-environments/C4> a edu:Question ;
    rdfs:label "C4 (2 points)"@en ;
    dcterms:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/> ;
    owl:sameAs <https://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/dso-evaluation-environments/C4> ;
    schema:hasPart <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-storage-operations#SO-153>,
        <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-storage-operations#SO-154> ;
    schema:identifier "C4" ;
    schema:position 4 ;
    schema:text "Exit gate, 1 each. (a) CA-12 does not pass EC-12: its only evidence is a vendor FAQ offering a 30-day download in the service's native backup format - not an open format, no documented or tested exit plan, no termination assistance, all of which RQ-12 requires for a critical outsourced function (DORA Art. 28(8); EBA outsourcing guidelines on exit strategies). EC-12 is marked fail or pending for CA-12. (b) CA-12 is therefore not recommended, whatever its weighted score: the answer recommends among CA-11 and CA-13 (or neither yet) and says the draft's recommendation rested on a gate that was not met."@en .

edu:Question rdfs:label "Question"@en,
        "Küsimus"@et .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-storage-operations#SO-153> rdfs:label "dso-evaluation-environments C4: exit gate passed on a vendor FAQ does not meet the exit requirement"@en .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-storage-operations#SO-154> rdfs:label "dso-evaluation-environments C4: the candidate failing the exit gate is not recommended"@en .