@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix edu: <https://knobit.org/def/> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix schema: <https://schema.org/> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://knobit.org/id/task/dq-service-levels-scorecard/C2> a edu:Question ;
    rdfs:label "C2 (2 points)"@en ;
    dcterms:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/> ;
    schema:hasPart <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-751> ;
    schema:identifier "C2" ;
    schema:position 2 ;
    schema:text "The SC-007 trend, one part. SC-007 fell from 99.4 % to 97.4 % and the draft blames branch data entry, but 23,140 term deposits migrated from the legacy savings platform on 15 September joined the population (95,870 records in August, 118,760 in September). 2 points when the answer (i) says the fall comes from the change in population, naming the migration, and (ii) gives the like-for-like series - the core book flat (99.42 % to 99.40 %) and the migrated deposits at 88.9 % - with the branch-entry explanation and the branch retraining withdrawn and the action pointed at the migrated records. 1 point for (i) without the like-for-like figures, or for the figures while the branch-entry explanation stays. The line stays red: taking the migrated deposits out of the population to make it green earns 0."@en .

edu:Question rdfs:label "Question"@en,
        "Küsimus"@et .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-751> rdfs:label "dq-service-levels-scorecard C2: a maturity date trend blamed on branch entry after a migration, with the like-for-like series"@en .