@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix edu: <https://knobit.org/def/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix schema: <https://schema.org/> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://knobit.org/id/task/dq-root-cause/C2> a edu:Question ;
    rdfs:label "C2 (2 points)"@en ;
    dcterms:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/> ;
    owl:sameAs <https://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/dq-root-cause/C2> ;
    schema:hasPart <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-552>,
        <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-553> ;
    schema:identifier "C2" ;
    schema:position 2 ;
    schema:text "OB-002's drop is in the denominator, 1 each. (a) The fall from 97.6 % to 42.7 % is explained by the population: risk model v3 (CH-04) re-rated 5,570 customers High on 1 September, of whom 70 have a source of funds, while the customers rated High before September are at 4,110 of 4,230 (97.2 %; June 97.6 %) - so no source-of-funds data was lost, and the migration (CA-003) is not its cause (migrated and non-migrated customers fail alike, and CRM-MAP-14 copies source_of_funds unchanged). (b) The action follows from it: no restore from the old CRM backup, and the 5,570 tracked against their enhanced due diligence deadline (AML-04: 60 days, 31 October) - DQ-240 measured against the EDD due date or the re-rated cohort reported separately, or EDD progress raised as an open question."@en .

edu:Question rdfs:label "Question"@en,
        "Küsimus"@et .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-552> rdfs:label "dq-root-cause C2a: OB-002 drop explained by the risk model v3 re-rating in the denominator, not by lost data"@en .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-553> rdfs:label "dq-root-cause C2b: OB-002 action fitted to the cause - no restore, the re-rated cohort tracked against its EDD deadline"@en .