@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix edu: <https://knobit.org/def/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix schema: <https://schema.org/> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://knobit.org/id/task/dq-profiling-assessment/C2> a edu:Question ;
    rdfs:label "C2 (2 points)"@en ;
    dcterms:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/> ;
    owl:sameAs <https://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/dq-profiling-assessment/C2> ;
    schema:hasPart <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-451> ;
    schema:identifier "C2" ;
    schema:position 2 ;
    schema:text "A trend in a pooled rate read as improvement. QM-106's comment says the rise from 0.9454 at 30 June (368,700 / 390,000) to 0.9582 shows the address remediation DQA-17 working and proposes closing it. Both sources fell (CORE 99.0 % to 98.8 %, LEGACY-NB 70.0 % to 69.0 %); the pooled rate rose only because LEGACY-NB's share of the customers fell from 15.4 % to 10.0 % after migration wave 1 - a pooled rate is the mean of the source rates weighted by their sizes. 2 points: the claim is rejected with that mix explanation (LEGACY-NB's falling share, the weighting or the change in composition named) and DQA-17 is not closed. 1 point: the claim rejected because both sources fell but without the mix explanation, or the explanation given while DQA-17 is still proposed for closing."@en .

edu:Question rdfs:label "Question"@en,
        "Küsimus"@et .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-451> rdfs:label "dq-profiling-assessment C2: a rise in a pooled rate explained as a population mix effect, not improvement"@en .