@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix edu: <https://knobit.org/def/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix schema: <https://schema.org/> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://knobit.org/id/task/dq-issue-lifecycle/C1> a edu:Question ;
    rdfs:label "C1 (2 points)"@en ;
    dcterms:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/> ;
    owl:sameAs <https://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/dq-issue-lifecycle/C1> ;
    schema:hasPart <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-650>,
        <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-651> ;
    schema:identifier "C1" ;
    schema:position 1 ;
    schema:text "Severity from the impact, not from the reporter, 1 each. (a) IS-103 is rated critical because the Head of Retail Sales raised it and the COO's office chased it three times; its recorded impact is a wrong branch league table in an internal weekly sales dashboard that is not in the board pack, with manual re-allocation by the regional managers - an operational impact. It becomes medium, the target date 2026-12-25, and the finding says the rating followed who raised it or how often, not the policy's impact levels. (b) IS-107 is rated low because one customer complained once; its recorded impact is interest not paid to 312 customers, EUR 18,460 already underpaid - a misstated payment to customers. It becomes critical, the target date 2026-11-08, with that impact as the reason. A severity changed without the impact as the reason earns half the part."@en .

edu:Question rdfs:label "Question"@en,
        "Küsimus"@et .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-650> rdfs:label "dq-issue-lifecycle C1a: severity raised by the reporter re-rated from the impact (IS-103)"@en .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-651> rdfs:label "dq-issue-lifecycle C1b: severity lowered by the reporter re-rated from the impact (IS-107)"@en .