@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix edu: <https://knobit.org/def/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix schema: <https://schema.org/> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://knobit.org/id/task/dq-critical-data-elements/I2> a edu:Question ;
    rdfs:label "I2 (2 points)"@en ;
    dcterms:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/> ;
    owl:sameAs <https://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/dq-critical-data-elements/I2> ;
    schema:hasPart <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-158>,
        <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-159> ;
    schema:identifier "I2" ;
    schema:position 5 ;
    schema:text "BCBS 239, 1 each. (a) The scope note is rejected for the right reason: BCBS 239 covers risk data aggregation and risk reporting for all material risks, liquidity risk included, not credit risk only, so RP-04 and its inputs belong in the review. An answer that brings RP-04 back only because every regulatory return's inputs are candidates, without correcting the claim about BCBS 239, earns 0.5. (b) The bcbs239 fields cite the principle each anomaly bears on: the PE-205 finding 4 completeness (3 also accepted); the CD-002 and CD-005 source findings 3 accuracy and integrity, single authoritative source (2 also accepted); the CD-006 and CD-008 owner findings 1 governance; and no finding cites principles 12-14, which are addressed to supervisors. 0.5 when exactly one of these is wrong or missing."@en .

edu:Question rdfs:label "Question"@en,
        "Küsimus"@et .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-158> rdfs:label "dq-critical-data-elements I2a: BCBS 239 scope beyond credit risk"@en .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-quality#QI-159> rdfs:label "dq-critical-data-elements I2b: BCBS 239 principle each anomaly bears on"@en .