@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix edu: <https://knobit.org/def/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix schema: <https://schema.org/> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://knobit.org/id/task/dm-model-review/I2> a edu:Question ;
    rdfs:label "I2 (2 points)"@en ;
    dcterms:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/> ;
    owl:sameAs <https://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/dm-model-review/I2> ;
    schema:hasPart <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-modelling#I-2109> ;
    schema:identifier "I2" ;
    schema:position 9 ;
    schema:text "Part B's scores follow the evidence, 1 each: (a) 'How structurally sound?' is below 15 citing the two validator errors (LE-024 with no primary key, LA-212 and LA-219 duplicated) and 'How well does the model capture the requirements?' is below 15 citing DR-312, a confirmed must requirement with no attribute; (b) 'How good are the definitions?' is below 10 citing the 24-of-31 check (or LA-207 and LE-025) and 'How well does the metadata match the data?' is below 10 citing the profiling (the POS and IVR channel codes, or value dates null on 3.1% of rows)."@en .

edu:Question rdfs:label "Question"@en,
        "Küsimus"@et .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-modelling#I-2109> rdfs:label "dm-model-review I2: scores follow the validator, trace, definitions and profiling"@en .