knobit.org

C1 (3 points)

edu:Question

https://knobit.org/id/task/dg-issue-management/C1

Also as Turtle · JSON-LD · RDF/XML

dcterms:licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
owl:sameAshttps://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/dg-issue-management/C1
rdfs:labelC1 (3 points) en
schema:hasPartdg-issue-management C1: GI-005 escalated past the owner
schema:hasPartdg-issue-management C1: GI-006 routed below the council
schema:hasPartdg-issue-management C1: GI-002 and GI-003 owners
schema:identifierC1
schema:position1
schema:textRouting to the lowest level with authority, 1 each. (a) GI-005 asks whether 99.5 % completeness is acceptable for closed loans' arrears - a DC-005 decision, which belongs to the domain owner (RO-003) - and the steward sent it straight to the Management Board: the escalation is pulled back to RO-003, with the finding that it went past the level with authority. (b) GI-006, the chargeback definition, is a dispute between the Card and Payment domains but is owned by the Payment data owner, who has no authority over Cards: it is routed to GB-001 under DC-004, with both owners consulted. (c) 0.5 each: GI-002 has no owner - the Customer data owner (RO-005) holds DC-008 for the Party domain; GI-003's owner is the analyst who raised it - the owner becomes RO-003, the DC-002 decider. en

Used by

has questionRetail bank data governance issue log - routing, escalation and closure (issue management anomaly skills)
schema:isPartOfdg-issue-management C1: GI-005 escalated past the owner
schema:isPartOfdg-issue-management C1: GI-006 routed below the council
schema:isPartOfdg-issue-management C1: GI-002 and GI-003 owners