C1 (3 points)
https://knobit.org/id/task/dg-bcbs239-mapping/C1
Also as Turtle · JSON-LD · RDF/XML
| dcterms:license | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
|---|---|
| owl:sameAs | https://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/dg-bcbs239-mapping/C1 |
| rdfs:label | C1 (3 points) en |
| schema:hasPart | dg-bcbs239-mapping C1: step 5 is a manual step in no control |
| schema:hasPart | dg-bcbs239-mapping C1: a control over the adjustments |
| schema:hasPart | dg-bcbs239-mapping C1: why CT-011 and CT-005 miss the adjustment |
| schema:identifier | C1 |
| schema:position | 1 |
| schema:text | The manual adjustment, 1 each. (a) Step 5 of the production description - the analyst applies management overlay adjustments in a spreadsheet after the extract and before the PDF, agreed by e-mail - appears in no control. The answer finds it and reports it as a manual step with no control. (b) It proposes a control over it (adjustments logged with amount and reason, approved by someone other than the analyst - the CRO or the Risk Data Committee - and the published figures reconciled to the mart plus the logged adjustments), mapped to accuracy (P3 and/or P7), or raises removing the step as a question; a finding with no control and no question earns half. (c) It says why the existing controls do not cover the step: CT-011 compares the extract with the mart before the adjustment is applied, and the CRO sign-off (CT-005) sees only the finished PDF, so neither would detect a wrong or unauthorised adjustment. en |