@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix edu: <https://knobit.org/def/> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix schema: <https://schema.org/> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://knobit.org/id/task/dg-bcbs239-controls-evidence/C1> a edu:Question ;
    rdfs:label "C1 (3 points)"@en ;
    dcterms:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/> ;
    schema:hasPart <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-governance#DG-450>,
        <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-governance#DG-451>,
        <https://knobit.org/id/register/data-governance#DG-452> ;
    schema:identifier "C1" ;
    schema:position 1 ;
    schema:text "Design against operation, 1 each. (a) CT-014, the review and CRO sign-off, is recorded as test_result effective, but the only Internal Audit test of it (TT-01) is a design walk-through: the answer sets test_result to not tested (or otherwise withdraws 'effective'), reports it, and names what an operating test needs - a sample of months showing the reviewed and signed report before distribution. (b) CT-010, the coverage check, passed its design test (TT-04) but failed its operating test (TT-05: two of three sampled months unreviewed, the April SEK gap flagged and not followed up): the answer sets test_result to not effective, reports it, and resolves it by fixing how the check is run (reviewer sign-off, flagged gaps followed up) with a retest - not with a redesign of the logic alone and not by leaving it effective. (c) The answer states the distinction it applied, in Part B or a comment: a design test shows the control exists and would catch the error if run; an operating test shows it did run over the period, by whom, with what result; the supervisor relies on the second."@en .

edu:Question rdfs:label "Question"@en,
        "Küsimus"@et .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-governance#DG-450> rdfs:label "dg-bcbs239-controls-evidence C1: CT-014 effective on a design walk-through only withdrawn, operating test named"@en .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-governance#DG-451> rdfs:label "dg-bcbs239-controls-evidence C1: CT-010 design effective, operating test failed - not effective, operation remediated"@en .

<https://knobit.org/id/register/data-governance#DG-452> rdfs:label "dg-bcbs239-controls-evidence C1: the design against operating effectiveness distinction stated"@en .