I3 (1.5 points)
https://knobit.org/id/task/da-architecture-decision-records/I3
Also as Turtle · JSON-LD · RDF/XML
| dcterms:license | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
|---|---|
| owl:sameAs | https://bitbucket.org/reffa/ontology/id/task/da-architecture-decision-records/I3 |
| rdfs:label | I3 (1.5 points) en |
| schema:hasPart | da-architecture-decision-records I3: G-3 confuses Zachman with the TOGAF ADM |
| schema:hasPart | da-architecture-decision-records I3: G-5 diagram has no legend and the wrong level of detail |
| schema:hasPart | da-architecture-decision-records I3: G-7 keeps the model as slide pictures, no architecture tool |
| schema:identifier | I3 |
| schema:position | 5 |
| schema:text | Gate-pack notes on method and presentation, 0.5 each; each needs a finding naming the note with the right reason. (a) G-3: the Zachman Framework is a classification of architecture artefacts, not a method; phases A to H belong to TOGAF's Architecture Development Method. The note is corrected (TOGAF ADM as the method; Zachman, if kept, to classify the artefacts). (b) G-5: Figure 1 needs a legend, distinct shapes for systems and platforms, distinct line styles for different relations, and a level of detail fit for the board (subject areas and platforms, not 140 tables). (c) G-7: the model and placements kept as pictures in slides: a data modelling tool or an architecture repository is recommended, so that the model and the placements can be maintained and traced. en |